ScottGould.me

Scaling The Levels Of Social Communication

smsIf a picture is worth a thousand words, then what is a tweet worth?

One of the things I persistently tell my staff is “get on the phone!” When trying to get information, sort something out, or close the loop on a contract or task, I really do hate it when people leave things to email when they could so easily pick up and phone and do it right there.

Even when my wife says to me “I’ll text them” I say to her, “why text and wait for an answer when you can get one right away if you call!” The other day I even had someone say to me that they hoped so-and-so got their tweet about their meeting. My answer again was, “Phone?”

We seem to have forgotten sometimes that our mobile phone does indeed make phone calls on top of email and tweeting!

How we similarily reduce Social Media to media

I think we also tend to forget that Social Media is social on top of media. We are trying to build relationships, provide useful experiences, develop connections and communities, create opportunities – but many are functioning on a level that will not get achieve these goals.

The connections that I have – the people that I am collaborating with, who are building with me, who partner financially with me - my communication with them is far more than a tweet. Of course it is! But so many are frustrated when they don’t get this level of connection, when all they are doing is just tweeting.

I keep telling people to Scale the Levels of Communication. What I mean by this is depicted in this model below:

Scaling the Levels of Social Communication

The idea here is that by sending someone a personal email, you communicate at a level that would’ve taken 50 tweets. Not rocket science, but I don’t see many people doing it. (Three people I have experienced who do this exceptionally are Chris Hall, Chris Brogan and Robin Dickinson.)

No wonder people aren’t getting the deals, the contracts, the opportunities – they are just keeping things at the lowest level of Social Media communication!

Anyone who works with me knows I want to make things as personal as possible, as quickly as possible. My preferred method of communication is totally a phone call, because it it conveys passion, enthusiasm, stress, trust, discouragement, stature, confidence, frustration, etc in a way that 10 emails one after the other just can’t.

A phone call means I can talk it through right there and then – and even better – I get to hear your voice. I get to hear how you communicate, rather than just reading it. Even better again is meeting up. If up to 93% of all communication is non verbal (and the rest that is verbal consists mostly of intonation, tone – things that are very hard to translate into writing), then how little of communication are we actually getting through 140 characters!?

Let alone, all the people who are dyslexic, unpractised at communicating in 140 characters, too busy to really get into Twitter, etc. By hiding behind your Twitter client you’re missing so, so much opportunity.

How I practically do this

- If you email or tweet me good or bad news, I’ll call you back.
- I tell people when they meet me to call me.
- If have something important to discuss, I’ll do it over the phone and just use email to set an agenda. I’ll then email you minutes of what we discussed for the record.
- If we’re collaborating on anything, I want to speak to you before we do.
- When I’m connecting with someone, even on a low level, I’m always looking to scale up as soon as I can.
- If I’m building a relationship with you and it’s long distance, and I really want to make it work, I’ll go out of my way to physically meet you (normally that means I run an event and pay for you to come, hey Trey and Olivier? ;-)
- While we work together, we’ll have calls at least once a week.

Does this scale? I don’t know. I’ll level with you, my companies are small and I don’t have many clients / partners. But I have a very deep connection with those few, which produces working relationships that I have been able to build incredible things with.

This ‘high touch’ also creates an exceptional level of VIP experience. It’s the same thing that we put into Like Minds for both our participants and speakers. I spoke to all our keynote speakers, for instance, several times in the months leading up, and am still speaking with them now. That’s what makes people call it things like “a conference apart” and “not the same old same old” – because we partnered in this together through regular communication with all involved.

Let me hear from you

Literally, call me. Let’s be doers of the word and not hearers only.

Are you scaling up the levels of communication? If so, how do you decide with who you want scale up? Is it hard to scale up?

Photo courtesy of Pixel Addict



  • Yep, I especially like that part where you put on a conference, raise money, and pay for me to fly across the ocean and be with you! You've been quite good about that!
  • Yes I believe there's an opportunity approaching for you to give this a go yourself :-)
  • ok, so I like this model. Where I work you sometimes get enormous email chains that go round in circles and on more than one occasion all it takes to break the cycle is one phone call.

    But I want also to offer a small challenge: I find talking on the phone quite intimidating. Email allows me to construct an argument, cross bits out, rearrange it. If someone challenges me on the phone, I sometimes struggle because my brain is set up somehow to think more slowly (but maybe deeply) through things.

    I think all these communication methods have their place and we are, as a species, only just starting to adjust. We've had millenia to adapt to face to face communication and the less immediate stuff has been around for virtually none of that time. Email has been mainstream for 15 years tops. The phone only a century (and that was just for the lucky ones).

    And now I'm not going to re-read this, move bits around, delete it and then cancel sending it altogether like I too often do...am just going to hit "post"...
  • LOL

    So yes, each method of communication has it place, and I'm not saying that we should be on the phone all the time.

    My point is that we must learn to scale in order to build stronger relationships.

    Consider you and I - our relationship is based upon lunches together, working together, as well commenting and emailing.

    This doesn't mean we don't do what we're doing now - but it means that our connection is stronger bc we have scaled higher already.
  • absolutely - and I am far more comfortable speaking to you on the phone because I've already met you.

    I think that, for maybe 50% of people, climbing the communication barrier is a major problem and depersonalising it actually helps reduce the amount they have to psych themselves up to do it. Hence technical people are much more prone to collaborate online (they've been building community software since the internet was invented) and struggle with face to face or phone interactions.

    You are absolutely right about scaling though: you can't replace body language and collaborating on stuff. That's partly why I did what I did, after all.
  • Agreed - a lot of people enjoy hiding behind the tech.

    But also a lot of people (like ppl who are dyslexc) just don't thrive on the tech.

    So we need solutions for both!
  • Sue Windley
    Well articulated article, Scott. In this maddeningly rapid world of change we live in, I think the most precious commodity now is time. Person-to-person takes time and effort which is why it is so valuable, yet the majority of us (especially in business) want to reach out to everyone as it's more convenient (and I'm just as guilty as the next person!). My compromise in social media (as my biggest frustration is the prevalence of auto-tweets) is to take the time & effort to write every tweet manually and only retweet what I find to be genuinely interesting because I think my "audience" deserve that level of respect. Am I being too naive or setting an unattainable goal?
  • Hey Sue, thanks for the kind words.

    Yes, time is a very precious commodity - I actually think that Action is the most precious commodity that we have (because I have time to waste in front a laptop watching TV, but I rarely waste my action)

    When we use this commodity of ACTION, something happens with people-to-people. We find that we connect with people who share the same vision, and we begin to connect.

    Sure, out of this we need to build deeper connections on a person-to-person to level, which does take time. But because so much relationship can be bulkt "on the job", we are able to identify who those people are that we will invest more time and effort into.

    However this is still I think a very idealistic view. It works for me, because I work on project / event basis. Making this bigger requires further thought.

    The respect you are giving your audience - I think that is good. But it won't get you much return unless you scale up the levels of communication with that audience. Turn your community into connections!
  • Sue Windley
    Interesting idea re action as a precious commodity - I will take some time to think that over!! I tend to use time to plan (prioritise?) my actions more carefully, simply because the nature of my business means I will always have more things to do than actual time available to do them all. I certainly agree about turning community into connections - social media has enabled me (at a local level) to network in person with many people I had not met before around Exeter / East Devon. So I promise to say hello in person next time we're at the same networking event!
  • Well let me know where you mulling takes you!

    I'm not really one for networking events - so best if we just meet up!
  • I agree Scott. I think the one fundamental problem is people mistake social communication tools to be personal communication tools!

    Without being scaled to a person-to-person level communication (that is based on good inter-personal rapport), social communication is pretty useless - unless your goal is to only promote & advertise.

    In your heirarchy, "I think" you should put person-to-person higher up than people-to-people. This is one thing I've learnt from my work in autism - people-to-people conversations often get out of hand and gives rise to jigsaw information and confusion (a complete breakdown/crisis in the case of an individual with autism). These are good only when personal relationships & connections develop from people-to-people conversations.
  • Hey Suraj

    I agree - person-to-person is the top level.

    I do find that this "jigsaw" problem happens a lot and I'm trying to find a way to solve it. I guess, as you say, person to person can help with this.

    This is the issue I have the unstructure movement is that it only caters for the very articulate.
  • Chris Hall
    You already know what I think Scott. Its a well written article and articulates perfectly how we all need to behave if communication is to improve throughout all aspects of life. It's too easy not to talk or meet these days and as you know, you and I almost always talk or meet when we have things to say.

    Twitter, Facebook or Blogs are places to begin relationships and find people you want to talk to. Life is not played out in 140 characters.

    This is why we have the strong relationship we do.
  • I like that = "Life is not played out in 140 characters"
  • codispodnik
    Thank you saying this, Scott. As someone that has been out of business circle for a few years, re-entering the marketing, the thought of opening up shop and consulting on my own has been daunting. (I was a stay at home mom a few years, but now want to be a consult from home mom). One thing that I learned in my professional life is the value of human connections. I don't love to sell anything, but I love to meet people and get to know them as well as possible, so I have done some work in sales, where that desire pays off.

    Now, I am learning all this internet and social media stuff, but I see the common thread here. It's still all about people. The reason I gravitated to you and Chris Brogan and Olivier Blanchard, after reading all the blogs I can get my hands on, is because you are the only ones out there saying....."it's still just communication." Social media is a new tool, before that there were other tools, there will be still others to follow, I'm sure. But....it's all just communication. If you care about the person on the other end and you care about them understanding your message, deliver it in a way that they can receive. That might be the phone or in person or an e-mail or (gasp!) in the actual mail! Parenting has taught me that you even need to get down on the floor sometimes to make your message clear and have a connection. So, fine.

    I just want you to know how inspiring your group has become for me. I appreciate you putting this out there.
  • Thank you *so* much for the kind words and the compliment. Knowing that people know you consider social media to be just another comms platform is a big compliment - as too many are considering that it's the be all and end all!

    The way I see it, we have varying levels of communication:

    person-to-person
    person-to-people
    persons-to-people
    people-to-people

    Getting to that top point is where we remove the viral effect of what we say, but we deepen the impact through proximity.
  • david365
    Working in a large organisation (I still like to call it the NHS!) its frustrating the way email has undermined effective communication. You get forwarded emails that take forever to find the pertinent message (if you bother) and you have no handle on who will respond and when. I've recently started asking myself, before responding with an email, "why not phone?". Or walk round the corner and talk to them face to face!
  • David - totally. And I feel your pain.

    The trouble with this is that emails have no 'contract' of response time, clarity, protocol, etc.

    But face-to-face has at least the contract of ' get an answer now! '
blog comments powered by Disqus